WeaponSpecs

China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 vs Raytheon (RTX) Patriot PAC-3

China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 and Raytheon (RTX) Patriot PAC-3 are both air defense system, compared here on public specifications. The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 leads on engagement range (200 vs 60 km). Several China-origin figures here are manufacturer or state claims with limited independent verification, so treat this comparison as directional.

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.

1

Add systems

Search here or add from any product page

2

See winners

Relative bars + who wins each metric

3

Decide

Verdict, spec profile, per-spec winners

Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →

Full data

Full spec sheet

China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 Wins 4/7
Raytheon (RTX) Patriot PAC-3 Wins 3/7
Performance
Max speed (Mach) (Mach) 4.2 Mach 5 Mach
Engagement range (km) 200 km 60 km
Engagement altitude (m) 27,000 m 24,000 m
Simultaneous targets 6 8
Firepower
Warhead (kg) 180 kg 74 kg
Sensors & avionics
Radar range (km) 300 km 170 km
Program
Unit cost (USD) N/A $1,100,000,000
Operator countries 3 19

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper? +

The Raytheon (RTX) Patriot PAC-3 has the lower public unit-cost figure at 1,100,000,000 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.

Is the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 better than the Raytheon (RTX) Patriot PAC-3? +

On the public specs we track, the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 leads on 1 of 1 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads