WeaponSpecs

Raytheon (RTX) Patriot PAC-3 vs Almaz-Antey S-400 Triumf

Raytheon (RTX) Patriot PAC-3 and Almaz-Antey S-400 Triumf are both air defense system, compared here on public specifications. The Almaz-Antey S-400 Triumf leads on engagement range (400 vs 60 km). Several Russia-origin figures here are manufacturer or state claims with limited independent verification, so treat this comparison as directional.

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.

1

Add systems

Search here or add from any product page

2

See winners

Relative bars + who wins each metric

3

Decide

Verdict, spec profile, per-spec winners

Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →

Full data

Full spec sheet

Raytheon (RTX) Patriot PAC-3 Wins 1/8
Almaz-Antey S-400 Triumf Wins 7/8
Performance
Max speed (Mach) (Mach) 5 Mach 14 Mach
Engagement range (km) 60 km 400 km
Engagement altitude (m) 24,000 m 30,000 m
Simultaneous targets 8 36
Firepower
Warhead (kg) 74 kg 180 kg
Sensors & avionics
Radar range (km) 170 km 600 km
Program
Unit cost (USD) $1,100,000,000 $500,000,000
Operator countries 19 4

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper? +

The Almaz-Antey S-400 Triumf has the lower public unit-cost figure at 500,000,000 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.

Is the Raytheon (RTX) Patriot PAC-3 better than the Almaz-Antey S-400 Triumf? +

On the public specs we track, the Almaz-Antey S-400 Triumf leads on 1 of 1 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads