Aselsan SİPER vs MBDA SAMP/T (Aster 30)
Aselsan SİPER and MBDA SAMP/T (Aster 30) are both air defense system, compared here on public specifications. The Aselsan SİPER leads on engagement range (150 vs 120 km).
Compare systems side by side
Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.
Add systems
Search here or add from any product page
See winners
Relative bars + who wins each metric
Decide
Verdict, spec profile, per-spec winners
Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →
Full data
Full spec sheet
 Aselsan SİPER
Wins 2/4 |  MBDA SAMP/T (Aster 30)
Wins 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Max speed (Mach) (Mach) | N/A | 4.5 Mach |
| Engagement range (km) | 150 km ✓ | 120 km |
| Engagement altitude (m) | 24,000 m ✓ | 20,000 m |
| Simultaneous targets | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Firepower | ||
| Warhead (kg) | N/A | 15 kg |
| Sensors & avionics | ||
| Radar range (km) | N/A | 140 km |
| Program | ||
| Unit cost (USD) | N/A | $400,000,000 |
| Operator countries | 1 | 3 ✓ |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper? +
The MBDA SAMP/T (Aster 30) has the lower public unit-cost figure at 400,000,000 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.
Is the Aselsan SİPER better than the MBDA SAMP/T (Aster 30)? +
On the public specs we track, the Aselsan SİPER leads on 1 of 1 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.
Where does this comparison data come from? +
Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.
Keep exploring
